|
||||||||||||||||||||
DNA
on Trial
by Catherine Gianaro Intro
| High court challenge | Who
should know and how much?
| |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Intro Genetics may have opened the doors to new forms of discrimination. Is there a legal defense? That may depend on the state in which you live. Imagine not getting a job solely because you carry a gene that causes Alzheimers or because your DNA increases your chances of getting cancer 30 years from now. As genetics advances the limits of science, it also pushes the boundaries of law and ethics. And genetics may provide the means for an entirely new form of discrimination. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pagnattaro explores the legal issues stirred up by new genetic technologies, such as genetic screening. In groundbreaking research, she has examined and compared current state and federal laws concerning genetic discrimination. There wasnt a clear sense of whats available across the country, she said, or whether some of the existing federal laws could be used in a genetic context. Pagnattaro focused on laws that protect people against genetic discrimination in the workplace. Her findings were published in the Fall 2001 issue of American Business Law Journal. She first investigated each states laws to determine what employee protection was available and what could be interpreted to argue a genetic discrimination case. Theyre all over the board, she said, noting that protection under the law varies in focus and scope from state to state. In general, Georgia law offers little protection for employees and there is currently no state law recourse against genetic discrimination, she said. In contrast, other states, such as New Jersey, New York and California, have laws prohibiting discrimination in the workplace based on genetic information and even restrict the gathering of genetic information. Under federal statutes Pagnattaro found little protection available. Theres no comprehensive federal law that would protect an employee or potential employee in a genetic discrimination case, she said. However, I think some argument could be made under the Americans with Disabilities Act, although the Supreme Courts recent decision in Chevron vs. Echazabal raises more questions and makes legislation all the more necessary. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Research
Communications, Office of the VP for Research, UGA
For comments or for information please e-mail the editor: jbp@ovpr.uga.edu To contact the webmaster please email: ovprweb@uga.edu
|
||||||||||||||||||||